![]() Slope of filter 6dB/octave.Īgreed, damping factor (or should we call it driving impedance?) isn't much from an output transformer, and as such "sod all" is appropriate wording. Replacing the grilles would remove that annoyance, and not cost anything. However, to get the cross feed a large number of op-amp stages are required to do the subtraction and summing and so the resulting sound might not be as good.Ĭone flap should not damage well made speakers, and if so it would only be of visual annoyance. I beg to differ on that, because some early stereo records have the bassists over to one side or another.Īnyway, as bass is less directional and the "cross feed" circuit doesn't result in phase differences within audibility (which your filter does), then it looks like a better idea. Purists may argue that it makes the lows mono, which isn't a good thing, but we are told that records are cut with mono bass below 300Hz anyway. This cross feeds the bass from around 150Hz and below and cancels the lateral differences from the cartridge where the rumble, we are told, comes from. If a 1Meg valve amp input the parallel combination will be 70k, and the turnover frequency only slightly higher at 22.74Hz.Īt the other extreme of say a 22k input solid state, the parallel combination will be 17k, and the turnover frequency much higher at 93.6Hz.Īnother much more complex way of doing it would be to use the channel subtract and sum method which has been doing the rounds since 1979 (see: ). By how much depends on the input impedance of the amp (or preamp etc). The values give a high pass filter which turns over at 21.22Hz (-3dB), but when the load of the amp it is driving is taken into consideration, the 75k will not be 75k, it will be less. Why should I be upset with you for doing this?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |